The problem with choosing teams with no real system is that it can sometimes result in the problems of (1) taking too long to pick teams eating into game-time and (2) the teams not being fair as a result of mismatched player ability in teams, resulting in potentially one-sided games, which is never fun, especially for the losing team.
I’ve created a calculator that enables you to create fair teams based on player ability broken down by (1) skill and (2) stamina. The tool is limited to five-a-side and seven-a-side games; please update if you need more players added, otherwise drop me a line and I would be happy to help. Once downloaded you will need to ‘Enable Macros’ when prompted.
Just use this before the game and send the teams out to all the players in the group chat prior to the game.
You may not want to make this a public document for obvious reasons.
One of the most important elements to successful project delivery is, Stakeholder Management; stakeholder management is the management of all parties that have an interest or stake in a project, ranging from, the people responsible for the project; subject matter experts; key decision makers; the do-ers, to the end users.
Effective stakeholder management can either make your job really easy or really hard; the better you are at stakeholder management and managing people’s expectations, requirements, input and perceptions, the more value you will get from your dealings and interactions with your project stakeholders.
Below I highlight effective and well-established ways of identifying; analysing and managing stakeholders.
If your role includes working in ambiguous project environments, with uncertainty or you are charged with delivering a project that is at its very early stages, identifying stakeholders is a high priority task. Some of the ways in which they can be identified is by first of all consulting with the individuals responsible for the sponsorship of the project, which one would assume would hold some basic or detailed knowledge around who the individuals or teams that may be affected by the project.
Although this is certainly a good starting point, it would also be value-adding to review project documentation produced to highlight the scope, benefits and value of the project, as these documents such as the ‘Project Initiation Document’ or ‘Charter’ will highlight the direction for the project, individuals/teams impacted and much more, which will give you good indication and direction on the people/teams/departments you may want to consider.
The project may be closely interlinked with other already established business processes, which may be owned by related stakeholders who would be a good source for information on interested parties.
You may want to reach out to core departments such as ‘Legal’; ‘Risk’; ‘Compliance’; ‘Customer Experience’ and other related teams if available to simply ask if they would need to have an input on the project; you may need to send them project documentation; it will typically be common knowledge however if you need to get certain teams involved.
Based on the above activities, it may be that you’ve now generated a list of thirty stakeholders that need to be considered as part of your project. Sometimes stakeholder lists, depending on the size of organisation you’re working with can grow to be quite big, so it is imperative that we employ a sustainable system that (1) enables the project team to understand stakeholder input/requirements/involvement etc, as expecting the project team to remember who’s-who in their head is of course unsustainable; (2) allows us to individually mark who requires what level of updates and involvement, as they are two important items, that are independent of each other.
The first part is to understand from your list, which stakeholders wield high levels of ‘Influence’ and high levels of ‘Interest’. Lucky for us, there’s a simple matrix that’s typically employed to understand where people on your stakeholder sit as follows:
The matrix below brings to your attention four quadrants that should all be managed accordingly:
– ‘High Power; Low Interest’: Little level of updates/input required, if any. The people in this group are considered to be passive, but may become more actively involved depending on interest and move in appropriate quadrant.
– ‘High Power; High Interest’: Should be kept informed throughout, as typically decision makers or high impact influencers.
– ‘Low Power; Low Interest’: Need little monitoring, as stakeholders are not interested, however may benefit from the odd periodical update.
– ‘Low Power; High Interest’: Should be kept informed of project activity, as may be able to influence powerful stakeholders.
With this information and your better understanding on the impact of individual stakeholders, it’s important to set up a Stakeholder Register/List and classify each stakeholder based on the results from (1) your influence/interest matrix and (2) knowledge on the level of input the stakeholders will have. I’ll talk about the register further.
RACI classification is system used to understand the what involvement, responsibility and/or accountability stakeholders have for project tasks/deliverables/updates etc. The RACI system is broken down as follows:
Responsible (for): The “do-er” who is responsible for delivering the item in question.
Accountable: This is the person who “owns” the project/task/activity who the buck ends with, who has responsibility for the activity/project/task at hand. This can also be stakeholders with decision-making abilities.
Consult (with): This is a person who will have an input on the project, which could include a Subject Matter Expert; end-user or decision maker
Inform: These are individuals who you are to keep informed of project/task/activity progress, who may be impacted by the project, mainly end-users or low power; high interest stakeholders.
A stakeholder can belong to more than one classification, however, be warned, this can get a little messy if you’re filtering with Excel, which we’ll talk about later. May be easier if you’re using a software package.
Nonetheless, this approach to classification will make it easy for the project team to identify individuals who need to be updated according to the stakeholder management strategy.
Here’s where you set the tools up to effectively manage your stakeholders. There are two key elements to effective management; they include (1) a coherent and useful Stakeholder Register and (2) Stakeholder Management Strategy.
This is the register that will list all of your stakeholders with respective RACI classification, along with any further information or insight in to that particular stakeholder. This typically works best as an Excel spreadsheet, with filtering capabilities. The spreadsheet may have the following headings for columns:
The stakeholder strategy will inform the project team on the level of detail of updates; frequency; who will be responsible for updates; detail of any walk-throughs to be delivered; when they will be delivered e.g. before sign-off requests; what to do if stakeholders are non-responsive, which will happen! And any other detail around the complete process of managing stakeholders.
Naturally, keeping all of this information in a centralised location and incorporating updates, deliverable releases etc in to your project calendar would be useful, as related tasks like this will ensure the correct stakeholders receive the correct information at the right time. It is also equally as important to maintain strict professional, based on a friendly, courteous and respectful approach, ultimately resulting in sustained relationships over the long-term that goes beyond the project. Remember, you may be working with the same stakeholder in the future and it is extremely important to maintain credibility, a quality reputation and good relationships for subsequent projects.
Not forgetting soft skills as part of your stakeholder management, the book, ‘How to Win Friends and Influence People‘ is certainly a must read. It drives the idea of emotional intelligence and has great techniques in how to get more value out of your relationships. Soft skills are an essential skill to a good stakeholder manager and developing these soft skills, by reading such books, or further learning, will certainly add value to your project delivery skills.
The Net Present Value calculation is a technique that helps us to make better decisions based on more variables that go beyond other investment appraisal techniques. It is probably one of the most widely used techniques in professional investment appraisal. It is used when you are looking to understand if a project is viable or not. It tells us the profit generated by the project and if whether it exceeds the initial investment, taking into consideration the term in which you need your money back by and any discounts you need to apply to that income such as costs, interest or required rates of return etc.
The NPV is the difference between the cash inflows and cash outflows, discounted by a rate that the future inflows will be subject to, therefore bringing all income to today’s terms or “present value”.
The tool includes the following variables, which you need to know in order complete the calculation:
Project Term in Years
Cash Outflow/Investment Required
Forecast Cash Inflows for Project Term
The way you know if whether a project is viable or not is from the output of the calculation. The NPV will calculate your result in monetary terms, that will either be more than £0 or less than £0. If it is less than £0 over the project term, then you should not progress with the project. Where however the result is a positive figure that is above £0, then the project, in theory, is positive and therefore, cashflow positive and able to pay off liabilities such as costs and return you initial investment.
I’ve created a calculator for some projects I am working on and have made it available for you to download here.
The calculator is limited to a project term of five years, as most forecasting is just guess work after that.
If you would like to level up your NPV game, you can read my blog post here about calculating your discount factor or ‘WACC’ – Weighted Average Cost of Capital.
Hope it’s useful. If you would like the calculator tailored, please email me and I’ll be happy to help.
I was on the search for better ways to manage my time the other day. I read about the Eisenhower Matrix in this book. President Eisenhower was admired for his time management skills.
I liked it, so I created a tool based on the matrix; the tool allows me to better manage my time incorporating dates, the below quadrants, notes and more. You can sort items by quadrant, date, requested by and more. I now use it for work, business and personal life – I have three tabs at the bottom of the same sheet for all different things and I tell you, it’s made a difference.
My tool named, ‘Eisenhower Time Management Tool’ can be downloaded Here.